Banco Montepio has been told to hold a permanent minimum amount of loss-absorbing funding equal to 21.19% of risk-weighted assets, a step that tightens the regulatory floor for the Portuguese lender but still leaves it operating well above the threshold.
Banco Montepio gets 21.19% MREL requirement

The Bank of Portugal’s decision, taken after a favorable view from the Single Resolution Board, sets the bank’s MREL requirement at 21.19% of total risk exposure amount, or TREA, from Sept. 30, 2026, and also imposes a 5.26% requirement on leverage exposure, the lender said. Including the combined capital buffer of 3.50%, Montepio’s total requirement on a TREA basis rises to 24.69%.
For investors, the key point is that the bank says its cushion remains ample. At the end of the first half, Banco Montepio reported an MREL ratio of 30.0% of TREA and 12.2% of leverage exposure, leaving it with room above the new floor and no minimum subordination requirement. That reduces near-term refinancing pressure and lowers the risk of forced, dilutive capital actions to meet regulatory targets.
MREL, or minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities, is central to Europe’s bank-resolution framework because it determines how much capital and debt a lender must be able to absorb in a stress scenario without taxpayer support. A higher requirement can matter for funding costs, balance-sheet strategy and the pace of issuance of eligible instruments, but in Montepio’s case the market reads are likely to focus more on management’s ability to preserve its buffer than on any immediate shortfall.
The bank said it plans to keep a comfortable margin above the regulatory requirement through organic capital generation, balance-sheet optimization and issuance of eligible instruments. That signals the requirement is manageable, though it also underscores the ongoing pressure on smaller lenders to maintain execution discipline in a more demanding capital regime.
For Portuguese banks more broadly, the decision points to a supervisory stance that continues to prioritize resolvability and stability after years of post-crisis reform. For Banco Montepio, the next question is not whether it meets the requirement today, but how efficiently it can finance growth while preserving headroom as the deadline approaches.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Banco Montepio | ▲Regulatory clarity | ▼Higher funding discipline |
| Bank of Portugal / SRB | ▲Stronger resolvability | ▼Less supervisory flexibility |
| Holders of eligible debt | ▲Continued issuance demand | ▼Potential spread pressure |
| Equity investors | ▲Lower near-term capital risk | ▼Slower capital distribution |
