Trading Volatility Boosts Big Bank Earnings

Wall Street’s biggest banks are on pace for about $180 billion of trading revenue in 2026, a surge that is lifting profits, supporting share prices and underscoring how volatile markets have become a money-making engine for lenders with large securities franchises.
The earnings strength matters because trading, especially in equities, is offsetting slower growth in parts of traditional banking and giving JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley a stronger mix of fees and market-driven income. A WSJ Newsroom analysis of results from JPMorgan, Goldman, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America and Citigroup shows the group is tracking toward that annual tally if current conditions hold through year-end.
For investors, the key takeaway is that scale and market access are paying off. Banks with deep trading operations are capturing more client activity from hedging, rebalancing and position-taking as volatility stays elevated, helping support returns even as credit trends and loan growth remain more cyclical. The result is renewed enthusiasm for the sector’s biggest capital markets players, which have also benefited from expectations that strong market revenue can cushion any slowdown in lending.
JPMorgan’s shares closed at $345.09 on Tuesday, up from $298.12 in early September and well above its 50-day moving average of $318.40, while Goldman Sachs finished at $1,082.55 versus $753.29 in October and Morgan Stanley ended at $215.54 compared with $149.31 in October. The recent price action leaves all three stocks above both their 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a sign that investors continue to reward the trading-heavy business model.
The backdrop has been a run of second-quarter results that beat profit expectations at major US banks, with trading desks contributing materially to the upside. JPMorgan reported July 14 net income of $21.2 billion, or $7.70 a share, up from $15.0 billion a year earlier, while Goldman and Morgan Stanley also posted earnings that reinforced how strong client flow in stocks and other markets is feeding through to the bottom line.
That strength is not evenly shared. Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup and other lenders without as much emphasis on capital markets are less exposed to the same upside, while investors remain alert to the risk that trading volumes can normalize quickly if markets calm. Still, the sector’s largest names are entering the second half with momentum, and traders will be watching whether earnings, macro data and central bank policy keep volatility elevated enough to sustain the revenue run.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley | ▲Higher trading revenue | ▼Dependence on market volatility |
| Bank of America, Citigroup | ▲Revenue lift from markets | ▼Less upside than pure trading leaders |
| Bank investors/longs | ▲Stronger profits, higher valuations | ▼Risk of mean-reverting trading volumes |
| Clients/volatility sellers | ▲Liquidity, hedging access | ▼Wider swings, higher execution costs |