Franklin Templeton has expanded its tokenized money market fund on the XRP Ledger by about $150 million in a move that underscores how large asset managers are testing whether blockchain rails can support real fund distribution at scale.
Franklin Templeton Expands Tokenized Fund on XRP Ledger

The addition nearly quadrupled the fund’s token balance on the network to almost 193 million sgBENJI shares, worth about $200 million at Thursday’s recorded price of $1.039 a share. For investors, the more important detail is not the size alone but where the tokens sit: all of the XRP Ledger shares remain in a single wallet that shares the same eight authorized signers as Franklin’s issuing account, highlighting that this is still an institutional, controlled distribution model rather than a broad retail-style on-chain float.
That distinction matters economically because tokenized cash funds are being positioned as a bridge between traditional money markets and digital-asset settlement. Franklin’s Singapore-domiciled fund invests in short-term dollar debt and money-market instruments, so tokenization does not change the underlying portfolio, but it can change how quickly shares can move, be collateralized or integrated into crypto trading venues. Franklin and DBS have already said they intend to support switching between sgBENJI and Ripple’s RLUSD for eligible DBS Digital Exchange clients, and DBS has said it will explore lending against the fund tokens. That points to a broader attempt to make conservative, income-bearing assets usable inside digital-asset markets where idle cash often earns less.
The structure also shows how much control issuers still retain over tokenized funds. Franklin can approve, freeze or recover balances on the XRP Ledger, and its own documents say the blockchain entries are tied to off-chain identity records. In other words, the product is using public-chain infrastructure, but not surrendering the custody and compliance features that money-market investors, regulators and distributors expect. The single-wallet setup could reflect an omnibus account serving one institution or several clients; either way, the model suggests early-stage adoption remains concentrated among professional counterparties rather than a dispersed retail base.
For XRP Ledger, the flow is a sign that the network is becoming more relevant in the contest to host real-world assets, though it remains far behind the biggest tokenized dollar pools. RWA.xyz ranks Franklin second on the ledger’s tokenized asset table, behind Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin at about $930 million and ahead of Ondo at about $185 million. That gives the XRP ecosystem some credibility in the fast-growing tokenized-assets race, but it also shows that stablecoins still dominate volumes and attention.
Investors should view the development as constructive for Franklin Templeton’s digital-asset strategy and potentially supportive for the broader tokenization thesis, but not as proof of mass-market adoption. The bull case is that tokenized money-market shares become a core plumbing layer for crypto trading, collateral and yield management, creating new distribution and fee opportunities for asset managers. The bear case is that the product stays mostly an institutional wrapper with limited secondary-market activity, making the headline balance increase more symbolic than transformative.
Franklin’s own shares have been moving more like a cyclical asset manager than a pure digital-asset proxy, with the stock trading around $31.64 in the latest data, above its 200-day moving average but below the 50-day average and with momentum indicators softening. That suggests the market is not yet pricing tokenization as a major near-term earnings driver. The real test will be whether Franklin can turn the XRP Ledger presence into sustained assets, active use in trading and lending, and eventually a broader client base beyond a few early adopters.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Franklin Templeton | ▲Bigger on-chain fund footprint | ▼Higher scrutiny on token control |
| XRP Ledger | ▲More institutional asset activity | ▼Still concentrated adoption |
| DBS / eligible clients | ▲Potential token trading and lending access | ▼Limited early access pool |
| Traditional money-market funds | ▲New distribution channel | ▼Competitive pressure from tokenized rivals |
