U.S. REITs Hold Up as Treasury Yields Pressure Deals

Higher borrowing costs are keeping real estate liquidity under pressure even as governments and lenders try to stabilize the market, with U.S. Treasury yields still elevated enough to restrain transaction activity, cap property valuations and keep refinancing expensive.
The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield stood at 4.652% in the latest forecast, while the two-year yield was projected at 4.163% and the federal funds rate at 3.625%. That backdrop leaves financing conditions materially tighter than the ultra-low-rate era that fueled acquisitions, leverage and development across the property sector.

For real estate investors, the key problem is not just the level of rates but their persistence. When the risk-free curve remains above 4%, cap rates tend to lag, buyers and sellers struggle to meet on price and liquidity thins because fewer assets clear at acceptable returns. That is especially painful for highly leveraged owners, refinancings and asset sales, where the cost of debt can erase cash flow gains and force discounts.
Exchange-traded real estate funds are reflecting that stress, though not in a straight line. XLRE closed at $45.27 on Aug. 14, above its 50-day moving average of $44.67 and its 200-day moving average of $42.25, suggesting the broader listed property group has held up better than the underlying transaction market. VNQ ended at $98.83, also above its 50-day and 200-day averages. But momentum has cooled: XLRE’s RSI reading was 43.9 and VNQ’s was 39.9, both showing weaker near-term demand after earlier strength.

That divergence matters. Public REITs are still benefiting from expectations that rate hikes are behind the market, but private real estate is facing a slower adjustment. The spread between listed performance and private liquidity usually narrows only when financing costs ease enough to revive deal flow, or when sellers accept lower pricing. Until then, the sector is likely to remain bifurcated: stronger balance sheets and defensive property types can weather the environment, while owners reliant on refinancing or asset recycling remain exposed.
Policy efforts to smooth the market may help at the margin. Authorities have moved to simplify procedures and digitize services, while finance officials have discussed valuation reforms and subsidized mortgage support. Those steps can improve market functioning, but they do not change the central constraint: expensive money. As long as rates stay elevated, real estate liquidity is likely to recover only gradually, and investor focus will stay on funding costs, maturities and whether private valuations finally reset.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Cash-rich REITs | ▲Can buy selectively | ▼Face slower growth |
| Leveraged owners | ▲Temporary policy support | ▼Refinancing pressure |
| Buyers | ▲More negotiating power | ▼Higher mortgage costs |
| Sellers | ▲Faster approvals from reforms | ▼Lower transaction liquidity |