Vietnam’s biggest lenders are promising to cut lending rates by 1.5 to 2 percentage points, a pledge that could ease financing costs for companies and households but also underscores how much the country’s banking system still depends on deposit funding.
Vietnam Banks Promise Lower Loan Rates
At a meeting with the State Bank of Vietnam on Oct. 19, Vietcombank, BIDV and Sacombank said they would trim costs and share profits to create room for cheaper loans, with BIDV alone preparing a credit package of about 100 trillion dong and accepting an estimated 500 billion dong hit to income. For an economy where bank credit remains the main transmission channel for capital, the move is significant: lower borrowing costs can support production, hiring and cash flow just as businesses face elevated funding pressure.
The lenders’ commitments are not merely symbolic. Vietcombank said it plans to reduce operating expenses, apply more technology and lower funding costs to make room for loan-rate cuts of at least 1.5% to 2%. BIDV said its preferential package will target manufacturing, business and priority sectors, with rates expected to fall to around 6%-7% depending on tenor. Sacombank said it has rolled out an incentive program of as much as 40 trillion dong. Taken together, the statements suggest a coordinated attempt to support credit growth while responding to official pressure to keep lending rates down.
But the discussion also exposed the limits of what banks can do on their own. Executives said the hardest part is lowering deposit rates without undermining savers’ willingness to keep money in the system. That matters because when funding costs remain sticky, banks have less room to cut loan rates without compressing margins. In other words, the real constraint is not just policy direction but the structure of Vietnam’s savings-and-credit market.
That is why the broader message from the meeting went beyond the immediate rate cut pledge. Industry representatives said durable relief will require a deeper capital market, including corporate bonds and equities, so companies are less reliant on bank credit. If financing remains concentrated in banks, lenders must compete for deposits to meet loan demand, pushing up funding costs and limiting how far rates can fall. A more diversified funding system would ease that pressure and help sustain lower borrowing costs for longer.
For investors, the near-term implication is mixed. Banks may win goodwill with regulators and support loan growth, but lower rates typically mean thinner net interest margins unless offset by higher volumes or lower operating expenses. Lenders with stronger low-cost deposit bases and better efficiency ratios are better placed to absorb the hit. Banks with weaker funding franchises may face a tougher trade-off between supporting policy goals and protecting profitability.
The policy backdrop also matters. The central bank appears intent on using the banking system to cushion growth, but the meeting shows that cheaper credit is only durable if funding conditions and capital markets improve. For now, the signal is clear: Vietnam’s banks are being asked to lend cheaper, and they say they are willing to absorb the cost.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Businesses and households | ▲Lower borrowing costs | ▼Banks’ lending spreads |
| Vietcombank, BIDV, Sacombank | ▲Policy goodwill, loan growth | ▼Net interest margins |
| Vietnam economy | ▲Stronger credit support | ▼Savings returns if deposit rates fall |
| Capital markets | ▲Potentially more demand for bonds and equities | ▼Bank-dominated funding model |

