Monte dei Paschi’s plan to win backing for its double share-swap offers is getting harder just as the Italian state steps back from the process, with Rome saying it will not vote its 4.8% MPS stake at the Oct. 29 shareholders meeting and will remain neutral on the bank’s deals for Banco BPM and Banca Generali.
Monte dei Paschi faces tougher vote on Banco BPM deal
The decision removes a potential source of support for MPS at a critical moment. Because the Siena lender is under the passivity rule, it needs at least two-thirds of the shares represented at the extraordinary meeting to approve the transactions, and Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti said the market should decide which offer is best.
That makes the Banco BPM leg of the strategy look especially difficult. Credit Agricole, which owns 29.3% of Banco BPM, repeated that it prefers a combination between Banco BPM and its own Italian operations, effectively setting a higher hurdle for any bid from MPS and signaling it can block any move that cuts across its interests.
Clotilde L’Angevin, Credit Agricole’s chief financial officer, said the French lender’s position is “solid” and that “nothing can be done without us, nothing can be done against us,” while also stressing the group’s long-term commitment to Italy. The comments reinforce market suspicion that any deal involving Banco BPM will have to account for Credit Agricole’s stake and strategic ambitions.
Reuters also reported that the Italian government has decided not to use its golden power on any of the pending offers, reducing the prospect of direct state intervention even as ministers signal neutrality. For investors, that leaves the contest to be settled more by shareholder arithmetic and partner bargaining than by politics.
The timing is important for the whole Italian banking sector. MPS is holding a board meeting after adding two new directors, while the separate Intesa Sanpaolo-backed Opas on MPS continues to move through approvals, with the ECB decision expected around mid-October and a possible launch in November if regulators clear the way.
The message for the market is that consolidation in Italian banking remains alive, but the path is becoming more selective and more expensive. MPS still has one of the sector’s most ambitious restructuring stories in play, yet the decisive votes now look likely to sit with large shareholders such as Credit Agricole rather than with the Treasury.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Credit Agricole | ▲Greater negotiating leverage | ▼MPS bid pressure |
| Banco BPM | ▲Potential standalone premium | ▼Unwanted takeover risk |
| MPS | ▲Neutral state stance | ▼Harder path to approval |
| Treasury/Government | ▲Policy neutrality | ▼Influence over outcome |



