Indian small and medium-sized enterprises are preparing to step up cybersecurity budgets over the next two years, but the bigger economic story is that most remain poorly protected even after being hit by attacks.
Indian SMEs Plan Higher Cybersecurity Spending
That gap matters because SMEs are a large share of India’s commercial base and increasingly sit inside digital supply chains that extend from banks and software vendors to manufacturers and exporters. If they cannot move from reactive spending to continuous monitoring and incident response, cyber losses can translate into higher operating costs, business interruptions and weaker productivity across the wider economy.
The SME Digital Insights 2026 Cybersecurity study found 84% of Indian SMEs plan to increase cybersecurity investment in the next 12 to 24 months, a sign that cyber defence is moving from a technical afterthought to a board-level priority. But the same study points to weak execution. About 40% of SMEs said they suffered a cyber incident in the past two years, yet only 28% made structural improvements afterward. Just 12% continuously monitor their cybersecurity environments.
For investors, that combination is a mixed signal. It suggests a larger and more durable spending cycle for cybersecurity vendors, particularly those selling managed detection, identity security, automated monitoring and broader platform tools rather than point products. It also indicates that many buyers will need outside expertise, not just more licences, which could benefit service-led providers and cloud-based security platforms.
The findings also underscore how artificial intelligence is changing the threat model. Roughly 35% of SMEs see AI as a cybersecurity enabler, mainly for faster threat detection and automated monitoring, while 34% expect AI-powered attacks to materially affect their businesses over the next 12 to 24 months. That duality is likely to support spending even in a more cautious capex environment, because AI increases both the speed of defence and the sophistication of attack.
The message from Tata Teleservices and CyberMedia Research is that Indian SMEs are at an inflection point: they know they need to spend, but many are still buying protection in pieces rather than building a continuously managed security posture. That should sustain demand for vendors such as CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet, though competition remains intense and customer budgets can be uneven.
For the sector, the key question is no longer whether SMEs will spend more, but whether they will spend on tools that actually reduce exposure. The winners are likely to be suppliers that can bundle monitoring, visibility and response into a single operating model. The laggards will be firms still relying on point solutions and one-off upgrades, which may look adequate on paper but leave the underlying risk unchanged.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Cybersecurity vendors | ▲Larger SME budgets | ▼Price pressure from competition |
| Managed security providers | ▲Demand for continuous monitoring | ▼Point-product sellers |
| Indian SMEs with mature controls | ▲Better resilience | ▼None |
| Reactive SMEs | ▲Short-term low spend | ▼Higher breach risk |

