Small-cap stocks are back in favor, but the recent move is rewarding growth-heavy names far more than business-quality screens, and that makes the choice between iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and Invesco S&P SmallCap Revenue ETF matter for investors trying to own the rally without overpaying for it.
IWO vs RWJ: Small-Cap Growth Leads Rally

The iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, or IWO, closed at $392.70 on Aug. 13, its highest level in the data set and up sharply from $300.66 at the end of March, while the Invesco S&P SmallCap Revenue ETF, RWJ, ended the day at $62.26, also near recent highs after a steadier climb from $44.31 in late November. The outperformance has been led by IWO, which tracks the growth slice of the small-cap universe and now trades above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, while RWJ’s rise has been more measured.

That gap matters because it says this is not just a broad small-cap rebound; it is a rotation toward companies the market expects to grow faster, even if they are less profitable or more richly valued on traditional measures. IWO’s 50-day moving average stood at $381.94 on Aug. 13, well below the fund’s price, and its RSI reading of 66.0 showed momentum remained firm without being extreme. RWJ’s RSI of 65.0 also pointed to a constructive trend, but its path has been less volatile and more incremental, reflecting the revenue-weighted strategy underneath it.
For investors, the distinction is central. IWO offers more torque to a risk-on tape because it leans into smaller firms with higher growth expectations, which can outperform when rates stabilize and sentiment toward cyclicals improves. But that same exposure can cut the other way if earnings disappoint or if higher discount rates pressure long-duration growth names. RWJ, by contrast, gives more weight to companies with larger sales bases, a structure that can reduce dependence on market fashion and make returns less dependent on speculative re-rating.
The technical picture reinforces that split. IWO’s MACD has turned positive again, with the indicator at 2.916 versus a signal line of 1.127, suggesting its recent advance still has traction. RWJ’s MACD is positive too, but narrower at 0.766 versus 0.846, consistent with a less explosive trend. IWO’s price is also sitting just below the upper Bollinger Band at 397.08, pointing to strength but not an outright breakout, while RWJ finished below its upper band of 62.94 after a quieter advance.
The broader market backdrop is helping both funds. Small caps generally benefit when investors move out on the risk curve, especially if the economy avoids a hard landing and funding conditions remain manageable. In that setting, growth-oriented small caps can outperform quickly because their earnings are more sensitive to an improving operating environment. But RWJ’s revenue-weighted design may appeal more to investors who want small-cap exposure without relying so heavily on valuation expansion.
The trade-off is clear: IWO is the higher-beta way to play a small-cap surge, while RWJ looks like the steadier implementation. If the rally broadens and earnings hold up, IWO could continue to lead. If the market becomes more selective, RWJ’s emphasis on revenue scale may prove more durable.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| IWO holders | ▲Stronger upside participation | ▼Higher volatility |
| RWJ holders | ▲More balanced exposure | ▼Less torque in rallies |
| Growth small caps | ▲Re-rating from risk-on flows | ▼Valuation risk if earnings lag |
| Revenue-weighted small caps | ▲Stability from sales base | ▼Missed upside in momentum bursts |

