Kenya’s payments market is getting a new domestic challenger, and that matters because every extra rung of local infrastructure gives banks and merchants a cheaper, more controlled way to move money without leaning so heavily on Visa and Mastercard.
Kenswitch expands into Kenya domestic card scheme
Kenswitch, long known for routing transactions between financial institutions, is now expanding into a full domestic card scheme. In plain English, that means local banks can issue and accept cards on a Kenyan-owned network rather than defaulting to the global giants for every payment and cash withdrawal. For a market where cards are still growing and digital payments are becoming more central to commerce, that is a meaningful shift in bargaining power.
The timing is important. Central Bank of Kenya data show the country had 13.76 million payment cards in July 2026, with debit cards making up the bulk at 11.16 million. Point-of-sale spending reached Sh297 billion in 2025, and transaction value through POS terminals was already Sh176.9 billion in the first seven months of 2026. That is not a niche market anymore. It is a real payments rail with room to scale, and the player that controls the rail can influence fees, data, settlement speed and product design.
For banks, a local card scheme could lower dependence on international networks and give them more flexibility in launching card products for domestic use. That may not sound dramatic, but in payments, control of the plumbing is where the economics live. If issuers can route more transactions through a domestic network, more of the value chain stays at home, and banks may have more room to compete on pricing or bundled services.
Investors should also pay attention to the broader competitive landscape. Kenya is not a card-only market; mobile money already has a much wider consumer and merchant footprint, with 94.35 million registered accounts and 575,400 active agents in July. That means Kenswitch is not replacing mobile money so much as trying to carve out a more important role in a crowded ecosystem where banks, fintechs, telcos and global networks all want a piece of digital spending.
The strategy is sensible because the market itself is changing. Kenswitch says it is building support for contactless payments through smartphones and digital wallets and exploring partnerships to load virtual cards onto devices. That aligns with the wider move toward tokenisation, which replaces sensitive card details with digital tokens and can reduce fraud. Visa has said tokenised credentials had a 39.4% lower fraud rate than non-tokenised credentials across its global network in fiscal 2025, while Mastercard has pushed tokenisation aggressively in Europe. The lesson for investors is that card networks are no longer just about plastic; they are increasingly about secure digital credentials that can live inside phones and wallets.
That said, the long-term winners in Kenya may not be obvious. Visa and Mastercard still have enormous global scale, while Mastercard has already been tying itself more closely to Safaricom’s M-Pesa merchant base. Kenswitch is entering a market where the incumbents have brand, reach and technology advantages. But if the domestic scheme gains traction with banks, it could pressure pricing and give Kenyan financial institutions more leverage over the economics of payments.
For long-term investors, the key takeaway is that this is another reminder that payments remains a fight for distribution, data and trust. The companies that own the rails, the security layer and the consumer relationship tend to compound value over time. Kenswitch’s move is worth watching because it shows Kenya’s payments market is still early in its evolution, and early-stage infrastructure shifts often create the biggest opportunities for patient investors.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Kenswitch | ▲domestic relevance | ▼dependence on routing only |
| Kenyan banks | ▲lower network dependence | ▼global network leverage |
| Visa and Mastercard | ▲tokenisation growth | ▼local market share pressure |
| Mobile money operators | ▲overall digital adoption | ▼card competition at the margin |



