Bit2Me has moved to build a new line of business around one of crypto’s fastest-growing needs: helping authorities seize, trace and safeguard digital assets in criminal and civil cases.
Bit2Me Launches Bit2Shield for Crypto Seizures
The Spanish exchange said it has set up Bit2Shield, a separately incorporated unit focused on crypto asset seizure and custody for public institutions, blockchain intelligence for financial firms and forensic analysis. It also hired Adrián Maroño, a former member of Spain’s Guardia Civil central operational unit, or UCO, as head of investigations, giving the venture law-enforcement credentials in a market where provenance, chain of custody and evidentiary standards increasingly determine whether digital assets can be recovered and monetized.
The move matters because the crypto industry’s next phase is not only about trading and payments but also about infrastructure for compliance, enforcement and asset recovery. As criminal investigations into crypto fraud, mule accounts and cross-border scams intensify, governments and banks need specialists who can translate blockchain data into court-admissible evidence and manage seized tokens without compromising legal process or security.
Bit2Me is pitching Bit2Shield as a one-stop operation that combines on-chain tracing, operational support during seizures, ratifiable forensic evidence, institutional custody and training. The company said the unit is designed to serve both public agencies recovering assets and financial institutions investigating and handling digital assets. Where conversion to euros is required, such as liquidating seized tokens, that step would be carried out by Bitcoinforme, a CNMV-authorized and regulated crypto service provider inside the group.
That structure is notable from a regulatory perspective. Bit2Shield itself is not a crypto-asset service provider and says its analysis, forensic work, operational support and training fall outside the EU’s MiCA regime. That allows Bit2Me to build a specialized service layer around enforcement and compliance while keeping the actual exchange and conversion function inside a regulated entity. For investors, that may signal a broader industry trend: exchanges are trying to diversify away from pure retail trading into higher-value institutional and public-sector services that are less dependent on spot volumes and more tied to regulatory demand.
The timing also fits a tougher environment for crypto crime. Authorities in several countries have stepped up seizures and arrests tied to digital-asset fraud, while recent reports of major hacks and illicit flows have underscored how difficult it remains to track funds once they move across wallets and jurisdictions. That backdrop has raised the value of firms that can provide forensic tracing, custody controls and courtroom-ready documentation.
For Bit2Me, the prize is twofold. First, it can position itself as a trusted intermediary for law enforcement and banks at a time when institutional adoption is still constrained by operational and legal risk. Second, it creates a potential revenue stream in a niche where expertise is scarce and barriers to entry are higher than in ordinary crypto brokerage.
The bear case is that this is still a specialized, reputation-driven business that depends on public contracts, regulation and the willingness of institutions to outsource sensitive work. Competition from forensic specialists, custodians and larger exchanges could limit margins. But the bull case is that as crypto becomes more embedded in policing, compliance and asset recovery, providers with both technical depth and legal credibility could become indispensable.
For investors, the larger message is that the crypto value chain is maturing. The winners may increasingly be the firms that can sit between on-chain complexity and off-chain legal process — and that can prove they belong in the room when assets are frozen, traced and recovered.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Bit2Me / Bit2Shield | ▲New institutional revenue | ▼Higher reputational risk |
| Law enforcement / public agencies | ▲More forensic expertise | ▼More vendor dependence |
| Banks / financial institutions | ▲Better crypto compliance tools | ▼Higher outsourcing costs |
| Criminal actors / fraud networks | ▲— | ▼Stronger tracing and seizures |




