AI tools and social media are linked to a broad decline in reading skills among 15-year-olds across 91 countries and economies, a setback that could weigh on future productivity and growth.
OECD Reading Scores Fall Across 91 Countries
The OECD said tests taken last year from 760,000 students showed reading scores fell 28 points over the past decade in member countries and 16 points elsewhere, with a 20-point drop roughly equal to one year of schooling. The deterioration matters because reading is the gateway skill for math, science and critical thinking, all of which feed labor-force quality and long-run economic output.
The findings put a fresh spotlight on how quickly digital habits are reshaping education. OECD education chief Andreas Schleicher said students are becoming “quicker but less accurate readers,” a shift he attributed to screen use and digitalization, with 46% of students reporting weekly or more use of AI chatbots to help them learn.
For investors, the report is a warning that the productivity boost AI may deliver to current workers could be offset by weaker skills among tomorrow’s workforce. That has implications for companies positioned to sell AI software into schools and universities, as well as for policymakers weighing restrictions on smartphones and generative AI in classrooms.
The OECD said the decline has been especially pronounced since 2018 among “advantaged” students, narrowing — but not eliminating — the gap with poorer peers and suggesting the problem is no longer confined to lower-income households. U.S. students ranked 13th in reading, below their 2022 showing, while the U.K. improved across all three tested subjects and moved into the top 10.
The report is likely to intensify debate over school phone bans and how AI should be used in classrooms, with the OECD saying bans on smartphones during school hours help halt the deterioration in learning. For education technology firms, the message is mixed: AI remains a growth market, but adoption that replaces rather than supports reading and research may prove a drag on learning outcomes and, eventually, economic potential.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| School phone-bans | ▲Better reading outcomes | ▼Less classroom distraction |
| AI edtech providers | ▲Demand for guided learning tools | ▼Scrutiny over misuse |
| Future labor markets | ▲Potentially better-trained workers | ▼Weaker human capital if trends persist |
| Students using chatbots to shortcut work | ▲Faster answers | ▼Lower reading accuracy |
