Bord Bia has disclosed a second straight year of breaches of State spending rules, underscoring how weak procurement controls can linger even as the agency says compliance is improving.
Bord Bia Reports €1.2M Procurement Breaches
The food and drink promotion agency said €1.2 million of expenditure in 2025 was incurred without a competitive tendering process, down from more than €2.6 million a year earlier. That means the level of non-compliant spending fell by more than half, but the Comptroller and Auditor General still described the breach as a “material level of noncompliance” with procurement rules.
For investors and policymakers, the issue matters less because of the absolute sums than because it speaks to governance, internal controls and the reliability of spending oversight in a publicly funded body. Bord Bia is responsible for promoting Irish food exports globally, so procurement lapses can raise questions about how efficiently it allocates public money at a time when governments are under pressure to demonstrate fiscal discipline.
Bord Bia said the spending was legitimate and authorised, and that the cases arose from expired contracts, purchases that cumulatively crossed tender thresholds or incomplete documentation. It said it had already strengthened supplier-spend monitoring, contract management and staff guidance, including targeted training and procurement seminars for staff in Ireland and overseas.
The annual report did not break down the 2025 figure, unlike 2024, when the bulk of the non-compliant spending was tied to market services and other marketing contracts, with additional amounts in legal, ICT and HR services. That makes it harder to judge whether the problem is broad-based or concentrated in a few functions, though the recurring pattern suggests control weaknesses rather than a single isolated error.
The report also showed consultancy costs more than doubled to €1.9 million in 2025, with spending on business improvement and new system development accounting for much of the increase. Headcount rose to 183 and remuneration costs climbed to €21.5 million, adding to the scrutiny around how the agency manages overheads while protecting value for money.
The wider governance backdrop is also sensitive. Bord Bia’s chair Larry Murrin has faced calls to resign over his company’s Brazilian beef imports, though the board effectiveness review concluded he was providing “clear leadership.” Against that backdrop, the repeated procurement breaches could keep attention on board oversight and the agency’s ability to tighten controls before the next annual report.
For taxpayers, the key question is whether Bord Bia’s corrective measures translate into a clean procurement record next year. For the agency, another reduction would help show the controls are working; for ministers, any further breach would keep pressure on State bodies to prove they can spend public money without avoidable compliance failures.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Bord Bia management | ▲Better controls narrative | ▼Reputational scrutiny |
| Taxpayers / State | ▲Potentially tighter oversight | ▼Continued compliance risk |
| C&AG / oversight bodies | ▲Stronger case for monitoring | ▼Exposes recurring breaches |
| Suppliers with contracts | ▲Clearer procurement process | ▼Fewer off-tender awards |




