India’s government appears to have enough fiscal room to absorb a revenue loss of about Rs 50,000 crore if it decides to abolish the long-term capital gains tax, according to SBI Research, strengthening the case for a policy move that could improve foreign investor sentiment without materially derailing the budget.
India LTCG Tax Cut Could Cost Rs 50,000 Crore

The significance is less about the size of the tax in isolation than about what it would signal: New Delhi is weighing a pro-market shift at a time when it is trying to deepen domestic capital formation and attract overseas money into Indian equities. For investors, the issue is whether the fiscal cost of giving up LTCG receipts is outweighed by a potential pickup in foreign portfolio inflows, broader market participation and a lower perceived policy risk premium.
SBI’s assessment adds weight to the argument that the government can afford the change because the budget has enough headroom to absorb the hit. That matters in a country where tax policy is often judged not just on fairness, but on whether it reinforces or undermines the investment climate. The bank’s view also suggests the debate has moved beyond whether the fiscal arithmetic works to whether policymakers are prepared to prioritise market competitiveness.
The timing is important. Indian equities have been trying to rebuild foreign interest after periods of uneven global risk appetite, and any easing of capital gains taxation could support demand from long-only funds that have compared India’s tax treatment unfavourably with other major markets. A simpler, more investor-friendly regime would likely be welcomed by brokers, fund managers and listed companies hoping for stronger liquidity and higher valuations.
There are still trade-offs. Critics would argue the government should be cautious about giving up stable tax revenue, especially if growth slows or spending pressures rise. Supporters counter that removing the LTCG levy could broaden the market’s appeal, increase transaction volumes and eventually generate more activity across the financial system. SBI’s projection that bank credit growth can still run at 14% to 15% underlines the broader policy backdrop: authorities want capital markets and the banking system to support growth together, not compete for it.
For investors, the key question is whether the proposal becomes a genuine catalyst for re-rating Indian assets or remains a political discussion. If the government moves ahead, the biggest winners would likely be domestic and foreign equity investors, brokers and sectors tied to market flows. The losers would be fiscal purists and, at least initially, the tax base.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Foreign investors | ▲Higher post-tax returns | ▼Lower tax shield from gains |
| Indian equities | ▲Stronger inflows, better liquidity | ▼Fiscal revenue from LTCG |
| Brokers and exchanges | ▲Higher trading activity | ▼Policy uncertainty if delayed |
| Government finances | ▲Potentially offset by wider market activity | ▼Immediate Rs 50,000 crore revenue hit |




