Indonesia’s inflation outlook is deteriorating as the El Niño weather pattern threatens harvests and lifts food costs, with Bank Mandiri projecting headline inflation of 3.5% by end-2026 and volatile food inflation as high as 6%.
Indonesia inflation outlook lifts on El Nino risks
The forecast matters because it points to a second-round squeeze on household purchasing power at a time when the main pressure is likely to come from staples rather than fuel or imported goods. For Asia’s biggest economy, food inflation tends to bite harder than broader price gains: it feeds quickly into expectations, wages and policymaker reaction, and it is usually the hardest to reverse once supply disruptions take hold.
Bank Mandiri said the impact will be most visible in horticultural products, especially shallots and red chilies, which are highly sensitive to dry conditions. The bank’s macro research head, Dian Ayu Yustina, said every 11-point rise in the El Niño index could lift shallot prices by about 2.4% and red chili prices by 2.2%. That is a significant risk for Indonesia, where food accounts for a large share of the consumer basket and where inflation dynamics are often driven as much by weather as by demand.
The bank’s 3.5% headline projection already incorporates the El Niño risk, suggesting policymakers and markets should focus less on whether inflation rises and more on how much of the increase spills over into core prices and inflation expectations. Even after some recent moderation in broader commodity markets, domestic food supply shocks can keep consumer prices sticky, particularly if dry conditions persist into the usual peak season.
The macro backdrop is also less forgiving than it was earlier in the year. South Sumatra and other producing regions are already reporting drought stress, and weather agencies expect the strongest El Niño-related dry period to run through September and October, just as agricultural output is most vulnerable. That raises the odds of fresh distribution bottlenecks and higher logistics costs, especially for perishable goods moving from farm to urban markets.
For investors, the implications are twofold. Higher inflation can erode real incomes and pressure consumer spending, while it also complicates the central bank’s rate outlook if price gains broaden beyond food. Sectors tied to discretionary consumption may face margin pressure, while agriculture, food distribution and grocery names could see more pricing power if they can pass through costs. The rupiah, which is already sensitive to global risk sentiment and commodity swings, could also come under scrutiny if inflation forces a less accommodative policy stance.
There is a counterargument: if the El Niño impact proves temporary or well-contained, headline inflation may peak without forcing a deeper tightening cycle. But the near-term balance of risks is clearly tilting toward food-driven volatility, and that is the part markets tend to punish first. For now, the key question is whether supply-side shocks remain confined to a few crops or spread enough to alter Indonesia’s inflation path into year-end.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Food producers with inventory | ▲Higher selling prices | ▼Consumers facing higher bills |
| Farm traders and distributors | ▲Wider margins | ▼Retailers absorbing cost spikes |
| Bank Indonesia hawks | ▲Stronger case for vigilance | ▼Borrowers needing easier rates |
| Consumers and wage earners | ▲None | ▼Real purchasing power |



