Brent crude may already be too cheap if Middle East supply stays constrained and Russia’s refining outages continue, according to Piper Sandler.
Brent forecast raised to $90 on tight supply

The firm lifted its second-half 2026 Brent forecast by $10 a barrel to $90 and went a step further, warning that even that level may underestimate what the market can sustain in the fourth quarter. For investors, that matters because oil prices still flow quickly into the cash generation of integrated majors and U.S. producers, while also feeding inflation and shaping energy market returns.
Piper’s call is grounded in a simple but powerful reality: supply has tightened faster than many expected. Brent averaged $88 a barrel through the third quarter, already above the firm’s earlier $80 midpoint, while diplomatic or military progress toward easing Middle East tensions has stalled. The research house said the situation amounts to a “stalemate,” a word that should make investors pay attention because stalemates in key oil corridors rarely end quietly.
Russia is adding another layer of support. Deep cuts to refining capacity there reduce the market’s ability to absorb crude, effectively removing a pressure valve that would otherwise cap global benchmarks. In plain English, the world is not just dealing with more geopolitical risk; it is also dealing with less spare processing capacity to turn crude into fuels.
That combination helps explain why Piper Sandler’s forecast reads less like a one-off price target and more like a reminder that oil markets can tighten quickly when several constraints hit at once. Brent was already above $91 in recent trading, and the market had no obvious sign of a supply relief valve from the Strait of Hormuz or from Russia. If either of those risks worsens, the $90 call could turn out to be conservative.
The investment case is clearest for energy shareholders. Higher Brent tends to boost free cash flow for the big integrated oil companies and for pure-play exploration and production firms, which can then support buybacks, dividends and balance-sheet strength. That is why the stock prices of oil-linked funds such as the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund and crude proxies have remained sensitive to every headline from the Middle East.
The contrast with natural gas is striking. Piper Sandler remains below consensus on U.S. gas, arguing that inventories held a 150 billion cubic foot surplus to five-year norms and that steady production growth has kept the market in “easy equilibrium.” That suggests the long-awaited demand boost from AI data centers and LNG exports may not be enough, by itself, to force a sustained gas price breakout.
For long-term investors, the message is straightforward: oil is once again behaving like a geopolitical asset, not just a commodity. If the Brent market stays tight, energy producers should continue to enjoy unusually strong cash flow, while refiners, airlines and fuel-intensive businesses face a tougher cost backdrop. The right response is not to chase every move higher, but to keep quality energy names on the watchlist and stay diversified for the next swing in the cycle.
| Entity | Gains | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Brent-linked oil producers | ▲Higher cash flow | ▼Lower pricing power if supply eases |
| Integrated energy majors | ▲Bigger buybacks and dividends | ▼Margin pressure if crude retreats |
| Refiners and fuel users | ▲— | ▼Higher input costs |
| U.S. natural gas producers | ▲Stable output discipline less needed | ▼Upside from a gas rally delayed |




